Now that the ENTIRE Mass-Media has been shown to be LIARS, can I count on you to support the TRUTH this site and radio show provides?

Now that the ENTIRE Mass-Media has been shown to be LIARS, can I count on you to support the TRUTH this site and radio show provides?
2 Comments

News that Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller is headed home without issuing new charges is a death-blow for the reputation of the American news media. Yet this web site which has been telling you the truth is choking to death financially trying to keep THIS news web site and free speech radio show alive.

As has long been rumored, the former FBI chief’s independent probe will result in multiple indictments and convictions, but no “presidency-wrecking” conspiracy charges, or anything that would meet the layman’s definition of “collusion” with Russia.

With the caveat that even this news might somehow turn out to be botched, the key detail in the many stories about the end of the Mueller investigation was best expressed by the New York Times:

A senior Justice Department official said that Mr. Mueller would not recommend new indictments.

The Times tried to soften the emotional blow for the millions of Americans trained in these years to place hopes for the overturn of the Trump presidency in Mueller. Nobody even pretended it was supposed to be a fact-finding mission, instead of an act of faith.

The Special Prosecutor literally became a religious figure during the last few years, with votive candles sold in his image and Saturday Night Live cast members singing “All I Want for Christmas is You” to him featuring the rhymey line: “Mueller please come through, because the only option is a coup.”

The Times story today tried to preserve Santa Mueller’s reputation, noting Trump’s Attorney General William Barr’s reaction was an “endorsement” of the fineness of Mueller’s work:

In an apparent endorsement of an investigation that Mr. Trump has relentlessly attacked as a “witch hunt,” Mr. Barr said Justice Department officials never had to intervene to keep Mr. Mueller from taking an inappropriate or unwarranted step.

Mueller, in other words, never stepped out of the bounds of his job description. But could the same be said for the news media?

For those anxious to keep the dream alive, the Times published its usual graphic of Trump-Russia “contacts,” inviting readers to keep making connections. But in a separate piece by Peter Baker, the paper noted the Mueller news had dire consequences for the press:

It will be a reckoning for President Trump, to be sure, but also for Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel, for Congress, for Democrats, for Republicans, for the news media and, yes, for the system as a whole…

This is a damning page one admission by the Times. Despite the connect-the-dots graphic in its other story, and despite the astonishing, emotion-laden editorial the paper also ran suggesting “We don’t need to read the Mueller report” because we know Trump is guilty, Baker at least began the work of preparing Times readers for a hard question: “Have journalists connected too many dots that do not really add up?”

The paper was signaling it understood there would now be questions about whether or not news outlets like itself made galactic errors by betting heavily on a new, politicized approach, trying to be true to “history’s judgment” on top of the hard-enough job of just being true. Worse, in a brutal irony everyone should have seen coming, the press has now handed Trump the mother of campaign issues heading into 2020.

Nothing Trump is accused of from now on by the press will be believed by huge chunks of the population, a group that (perhaps thanks to this story) is now larger than his original base. As Baker notes, a full 50.3% of respondents in a poll conducted this month said they agree with Trump the Mueller probe is a “witch hunt.”

Stories have been coming out for some time now hinting Mueller’s final report might leave audiences “disappointed,” as if a President not being a foreign spy could somehow be bad news.

Openly using such language has, all along, been an indictment. Imagine how tone-deaf you’d have to be to not realize it makes you look bad, when news does not match audience expectations you raised. To be unaware of this is mind-boggling, the journalistic equivalent of walking outside without pants.

There will be people protesting: the Mueller report doesn’t prove anything! What about the 37 indictments? The convictions? The Trump tower revelations? The lies! The meeting with Don, Jr.? The financial matters! There’s an ongoing grand jury investigation, and possible sealed indictments, and the House will still investigate, and…

Stop. Just stop. Any journalist who goes there is making it worse.

For years, every pundit and Democratic pol in Washington hyped every new Russia headline like the Watergate break-in. Now, even Nancy Pelosi has said impeachment is out, unless something “so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan” against Trump is uncovered it would be worth their political trouble to prosecute.

The biggest thing this affair has uncovered so far is Donald Trump paying off a porn star. That’s a hell of a long way from what this business was supposedly about at the beginning, and shame on any reporter who tries to pretend this isn’t so.

The story hyped from the start was espionage: a secret relationship between the Trump campaign and Russian spooks who’d helped him win the election.

The betrayal narrative was not reported as metaphor. It was not “Trump likes the Russians so much, he might as well be a spy for them.” It was literal spying, treason, and election-fixing – crimes so severe, former NSA employee John Schindler told reporters, Trump “will die in jail.”

WHILE THE MASS-MEDIA WAS SPEWING THIS TRIPE, WHO WAS IT, WEEK-AFTER-WEEK FOR OVER TWO YEARS, TELLING YOU "IT'S NOTHING.  THIS ACCUSATION AGAINST TRUMP IS GARBAGE; DON'T BELIEVE IT."   

Me.

So here we are, 675 Days into the official Mueller investigation, and it turns out I was right and ALL the rest of the mass-media was wrong.  I'm not gloating, I'm stating fact.

And I do so because right now, today, despite being among the ONLY media outlets telling you the blunt truth, I am choking to death financially trying to keep this news media outlet funded.  Next month is a real doubt for its existence!

In the early months of this scandal, the New York Times said Trump’s campaign had “repeated contacts” with Russian intelligence; the Wall Street Journal told us our spy agencies were withholding intelligence from the new President out of fear he was compromised; news leaked out our spy chiefs had even told other countries like Israel not to share their intel with us, because the Russians might have “leverages of pressure” on Trump.

 

CNN told us Trump officials had been in “constant contact” with “Russians known to U.S. intelligence,” and the former director of the CIA, who’d helped kick-start the investigation that led to Mueller’s probe, said the President was guilty of “high crimes and misdemeanors,” committing acts “nothing short of treasonous.”

Hillary Clinton insisted Russians “could not have known how to weaponize” political ads unless they’d been “guided” by Americans. Asked if she meant Trump, she said, “It’s pretty hard not to.” Harry Reid similarly said he had “no doubt” that the Trump campaign was “in on the deal” to help Russians with the leak.

None of this has been walked back. To be clear, if Trump were being blackmailed by Russian agencies like the FSB or the GRU, if he had any kind of relationship with Russian intelligence, that would soar over the “overwhelming and bipartisan” standard, and Nancy Pelosi would be damning torpedoes for impeachment right now.

There was never real gray area here. Either Trump is a compromised foreign agent, or he isn’t. If he isn’t, news outlets once again swallowed a massive disinformation campaign, only this error is many orders of magnitude more stupid than any in the recent past, WMD included. Honest reporters like ABC’s Terry Moran understand: Mueller coming back empty-handed on collusion means a “reckoning for the media.”

Of course, there won’t be such a reckoning. (There never is). But there should be. The legacy mass-media broke every written and unwritten rule in pursuit of this story, starting with the prohibition on reporting things they can’t confirm.

I don't do such things.  My stories are factual.  If I make a mistake, I admit it.  But the way donations are NOT COMING IN, none of that may matter -- I may be gone out of existence by April.

PLEASE SHOW THAT THE TRUTH MATTERS TO YOU.  PLEASE DONATE TO KEEP THIS VENTURE ALIVE.

I really need your help this month to continue providing REAL NEWS and REAL FREEDOM OF SPEECH on RADIO -- so please either SUBSCRIBE for $1 a week billed Quarterly ($13) HERE or for $5 a month HERE  which will get you full access to all content on this site, or make a donation.


Click the Donate Button Below . . .

 

 

You must login to post a comment.
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • This commment is unpublished.
    Janet Christophersen · 4 months ago
    Muellar spent 30 million, knew there was no collusion from the start, so what was he really busy with.
    • This commment is unpublished.
      Carl Goldsworthy · 4 months ago
      Forcing Trump to take on Bolton and Pence anti Russian war mongers - to prove his "patriotism".
      An old political ploy - as used by the jews accusing a political enemy as anti semitic, holocaust deniers etc.
  • This commment is unpublished.
    Carl Goldsworthy · 4 months ago
    The current CNN news script is this - "Trump was not found guilty. But neither was Trump exonerated."
    The USA has gone through the looking glass - Trump is guilty because they said he is - but he has hidden the evidence !
    He must be punished for hiding the evidence ! Torture him to death until he confesses !