WHERE IS THE "ACTIVE DENIAL SYSTEM" FOR BORDER PROTECTION?

WHERE IS THE "ACTIVE DENIAL SYSTEM" FOR BORDER PROTECTION?
3 Comments

The citizens of the United States spent tens-of-millions of our hard-earned dollars, for the military, through Raytheon, to develop the "Active Denial System" (Heat Ray) to be able to use non-lethal force.  The system was developed and works . . . so why isn't it being used at the southern border to repel illegal alien invaders?

The Active Denial System (ADS) is a non-lethal, directed-energy weapon developed by the U.S. military, designed for area denial, perimeter security and crowd control.  Informally, the weapon is also called the heat ray since it works by heating the surface of targets, such as the skin of targeted human subjects. 

Raytheon is currently marketing a reduced-range version of this technology. The ADS was deployed in 2010 with the United States military in the Afghanistan War, but was withdrawn without seeing combat.

On August 20, 2010, the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department announced its intent to use this technology on prisoners in the Pitchess Detention Center in Los Angeles, stating its intent to use it in "operational evaluation" in situations such as breaking up prisoner fights.

As of 2014, the ADS was only a vehicle-mounted weapon, though U.S. Marines and police were both working on portable versions. ADS was developed under the sponsorship of the DoD Non-Lethal Weapons Program with the Air Force Research Laboratory as the lead agency.

The ADS works by firing a high-powered beam of 95 GHz waves at a target, which corresponds to a wavelength of 3.2 mm. The ADS millimeter wave energy works on a similar principle as a microwave oven, exciting the water and fat molecules in the skin, and instantly heating them via dielectric heating. One significant difference is that a microwave oven uses the much lower frequency (and longer wavelength) of 2.45 GHz. The short millimeter waves used in ADS only penetrate the top layers of skin, with most of the energy being absorbed within 0.4 mm (​1⁄64 inch), whereas microwaves will penetrate into human tissue about 17 mm (0.67 inch).

The ADS's effect of repelling humans occurs at slightly higher than 44 °C (111 °F), though first-degree burns occur at about 51 °C (124 °F), and second-degree burns occur at about 58 °C (136 °F).[16] In testing, pea-sized blisters have been observed in less than 0.1% of ADS exposures, indicating that second degree surface burns have been caused by the device. The radiation burns caused are similar to microwave burns, but only on the skin surface due to the decreased penetration of shorter millimeter waves. The surface temperature of a target will continue to rise so long as the beam is applied, at a rate dictated by the target's material and distance from the transmitter, along with the beam's frequency and power level set by the operator. Most human test subjects reached their pain threshold within 3 seconds, and none could endure more than 5 seconds.

A spokesman for the Air Force Research Laboratory described his experience as a test subject for the system:

For the first millisecond, it just felt like the skin was warming up. Then it got warmer and warmer and you felt like it was on fire. ... As soon as you're away from that beam your skin returns to normal and there is no pain.

Like all focused energy, the beam will irradiate all matter in the targeted area, including everything beyond/behind it that is not shielded, with no possible discrimination between individuals, objects or materials. Anyone incapable of leaving the target area (e.g., physically handicapped, infants, incapacitated, trapped, etc.) would continue to receive radiation until the operator turned off the beam. Reflective materials such as aluminum cooking foil should reflect this radiation and could be used to make clothing that would be protective against this radiation.

Following approximately ten thousand test exposures of volunteers to ADS beams, a Penn State Human Effects Advisory Panel (HEAP) concluded that ADS is a non-lethal weapon that has a high probability of effectiveness with a low probability of injury:

  • no significant effects for wearers of contact lenses or other eyewear (including night vision goggles)
  • normal skin applications, such as cosmetics, have little effect on ADSʼs interaction with skin
  • no age-related differences in response to ADS exposures
  • no effect on the male reproduction system
  • damage was the occurrence of pea-sized blisters in less than 0.1% of the exposures (6 of 10,000 exposures).

In April 2007, one airman in an ADS test was overdosed and received second-degree burns on both legs, and was treated in a hospital for two days. There was also one laboratory accident in 1999 that resulted in a small second-degree burn.

Clearly, the technology has been successfully developed and successfully used.   So why isn't it being used to secure the southern border of the United States from the HUNDREDS-OF-THOUSANDS of diseased, criminal, illegal alien invaders crossing that border?

Why did millions of hard-earned taxpayer dollars go into developing a system like this, just to have it sit on a shelf, or in a warehouse, unused, while our nation gets invaded?

HINT:  Because the people in the federal government WANT those invaders coming here.  The government DOESN'T WANT to stop them or deter them.  Border Security has become a complete joke to the government.  

Maybe it's time for the general public to develop their own version of this technology and deploy along the border via civilians?  

 

 

 

 

You must login to post a comment.
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • This commment is unpublished.
    Peter Milne · 9 days ago
    Was this not used by Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili back in 2013 on demonstrators ??
  • This commment is unpublished.
    Reginald Fischer · 9 days ago
    The ADS is for we the people - to control the citizenry under martial law.
    • This commment is unpublished.
      Jilliam · 9 days ago
      I think your right. They will bring it out under martial law NDAA to take away all our rights. I think the guest last broadcast was right on about a medical martial law scenario.
  • This commment is unpublished.
    Really · 9 days ago
    I agree. I recommended this when the first caravan was heading our way. Where is this system?